Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a special federal court procedure used to consolidate civil cases from different districts that involve similar facts or legal issues. The goal is to streamline pretrial proceedings, avoid duplicative discovery, and ensure consistent rulings across similar cases. In personal injury law, MDLs are often used for mass tort cases like defective drug claims, medical device failures, or large-scale accidents. While cases are coordinated, each plaintiff still has their own individual claim and trial rights.
It’s used when many lawsuits filed across the country share similar facts, making separate litigation inefficient. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decides whether to centralize cases and assigns them to one federal judge for pretrial management. This avoids conflicting rulings and saves time for all parties involved.
It can significantly reduce litigation costs for plaintiffs by allowing shared expert witnesses and coordinated discovery. It also prevents defendants from having to fight the same issues in multiple courts, which speeds up resolution. However, cases in MDL can still take years to resolve and may involve complex negotiations.
In a class action, all plaintiffs are part of one collective case with a single outcome, while in MDL, each case remains separate. MDL focuses on efficiency in pretrial matters, but plaintiffs still have the right to pursue individual trials if no settlement is reached.
Conclusion:
Multidistrict litigation helps manage large groups of related injury cases efficiently, while still preserving each plaintiff’s right to their own trial and potential recovery.
It’s a process that consolidates similar federal cases for pretrial purposes to improve efficiency.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation makes the decision.
No — in MDL, cases remain separate and plaintiffs keep their own trial rights.
Defective drugs, dangerous products, mass accidents, and environmental disasters.
What is Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences? What is the doctrine of avoidable consequences in personal injury law?The doctrine of avoidable consequences is a legal.
What is Independent Medical Examination? What is an independent medical examination in personal injury law?An independent medical examination (IME) is a medical evaluation requested by.
What is Res Judicata? What is collateral estoppel in personal injury law?Collateral estoppel, also known as “issue preclusion,” is a legal rule that prevents.
Discover Next
Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.