Over the last decade, as the youngest generation skips punctuation and chooses emojis over words, Supreme Court justices have also embraced a more casual writing style. They’re not cutting out apostrophes, using abbreviations willy-nilly, or dropping smiley-faces in opinions—yet. But the justices are relaxing their grammar, shortening words and sentences, and striving to make their writing more accessible.
To help writers modernize their style, even as writing style evolves, I spent five years studying every U.S. Supreme Court opinion starting in 2018, spanning more than 10,000 pages. I analyzed how the justices treat the most important and interesting points of grammar and writing style. And I uncovered a fascinating reality: writing evolves so rapidly that even the Supreme Court justices sometimes disagree on when to ignore writing tradition and where to hold true to traditional rules.
Many have vaulted toward informality and use contractions, despite Justice Antonin Scalia’s complaint that they are “intellectually abominable.”2
Some justices write Congress’ to show the possessive; others write Congress’s. Some use because interchangeably with since; some wouldn’t dare.
I compiled the findings in my book, The Supreme Guide to Writing (Oxford University Press 2024), where I settled debates on more than 30 points of legal grammar and style by following the Court’s own example: adopting the majority rule. For instance, when at least five of the nine justices use contractions (as they do now), that majority rule prevails. My goal is to give lawyers clear, practical guidelines, so they can avoid costly mistakes—like a $5 million comma debacle in Maine. In that case, lawmakers followed the instruction in the legislative drafting manual to avoid the serial comma—a decision that made a law about overtime so confusing that it led to years of litigation.3
The following two chapters are excerpts from The Supreme Guide to Writing. They show how to make your writing clearer and concise—by following the lead of the nine esteemed justices sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court.
“In particular, the majority zeros in on the disjunctive conjunction ‘or,’ and proceeds to build its entire opinion around that linguistic feature.” 1
—Justice Neil Gorsuch
JANIE WAS WORKING through the needlessly briny, settled half of her shitty martini, in gulps of two, when she spotted his blazer, jeans, and wingtips breaching the stainedglass gates of the asinine hipster drinking den on which he had insisted via text late night at 2:51 in the morning when she had made the tragic…
In 2020, a dear friend lost his fight with alcohol and mental health. He was a brilliant lawyer. He was first in his law school class, clerked for the Supreme Court, and had the successful career to match. And then he wasn’t there any more. I miss my friend.
A prominent law firm has denied using artificial intelligence to generate flawed legal citations after a federal judge identified multiple citation errors in a motion to dismiss. The firm’s formal…
Discover Next
Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.
Professor of legal writing at the University of Miami School of Law and author of "The Supreme Guide to Writing."