The Trial Lawyer's Journal

TLJ Small Logo
Close
Group 39053677
Share Your Story with Trial Lawyer’s Journal
Trial Lawyer’s Journal is built on the voices of trial lawyers like you. Share your journey, insights, and experiences through articles, interviews, and our podcast, Celebrating Justice.
Contribute
Stay Updated
Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest from TLJ.



    {01}
    Podcasts
    Season 1
    Season 2
    {02}
    Print Editions
    Volume 1
    Volume 2
    {03}
    Articles
    {04}
    Our Story
    {04}
    Join
    Explore Membership
    {05}
    Contact
    Follow

    Category: Glossary

    Posted on

    What is Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences?

    What is Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences?

    What is the doctrine of avoidable consequences in personal injury law?

    The doctrine of avoidable consequences is a legal rule that limits the damages an injured person can recover if they fail to take reasonable steps to reduce or “mitigate” their losses after an accident. The law expects plaintiffs to act sensibly to avoid making their injuries worse or increasing their financial harm. This doesn’t mean they must take extraordinary measures — only that they should behave as a reasonable person would under the circumstances. If they don’t, any damages caused by their inaction may be reduced.

    • Limits damages if victim fails to mitigate harm.

    • Requires reasonable post-injury actions.

    • No need for extraordinary measures.

    • Applies to physical and financial losses.

    When does this doctrine apply?

    It applies when the injured person’s inaction or poor choices after the accident cause additional harm or expense. For example, refusing necessary medical treatment without a good reason could limit recovery. Courts assess whether the plaintiff’s conduct was reasonable given their situation.

    • When post-injury actions worsen damages.

    • Examples: refusing needed medical care.

    • Must assess reasonableness of decisions.

    • Based on case-specific facts.

    Why is the doctrine important?

    It encourages fairness by preventing plaintiffs from recovering for harm they could have avoided. It also incentivizes injured parties to follow medical advice, seek appropriate treatment, and protect themselves from further loss. This helps ensure damages reflect the actual harm caused by the defendant’s negligence.

    • Promotes fairness in compensation.

    • Encourages following medical advice.

    • Prevents inflated damage claims.

    • Keeps focus on defendant’s actual harm.

    Does this mean plaintiffs must fix everything right away?

    No. The law doesn’t require unreasonable expense or risk. Plaintiffs are only expected to take reasonable measures that a typical person in the same situation would take. What’s reasonable will depend on the circumstances, medical advice, and financial means of the injured person.

    • No extraordinary effort or expense required.

    • Only reasonable actions expected.

    • Circumstances dictate reasonableness.

    • Focus on practical mitigation steps.

    Conclusion:
     The doctrine of avoidable consequences ensures damages reflect the harm truly caused by the defendant, while encouraging injured parties to take reasonable steps to limit further loss.

    What is the doctrine of avoidable consequences?

    It’s a rule that limits damages if an injured person fails to take reasonable steps to reduce their losses.

    Yes — it can apply in most cases where the plaintiff’s actions after the injury affect damages.

    Generally yes, unless you have a reasonable justification for not doing so.

    Yes — if the plaintiff’s inaction greatly increased losses.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Independent Medical Examination?

    What is Independent Medical Examination?

    What is an independent medical examination in personal injury law?

    An independent medical examination (IME) is a medical evaluation requested by the opposing party — often the defendant’s insurance company — to assess the nature, extent, and cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. While it’s called “independent,” the doctor is usually chosen and paid for by the insurance company, so the evaluation may favor the defense. IMEs are commonly ordered when there’s a dispute over the seriousness of an injury or whether it was caused by the accident in question. The results can play a significant role in settlement negotiations and trial testimony.

    • Medical exam requested by opposing party.

    • Used to evaluate injury claims.

    • Doctor often chosen by defense.

    • Can affect settlement and trial strategy.

    When are IMEs used in personal injury cases?

    They’re typically used when the defense wants to verify the plaintiff’s medical condition or challenge the treating doctor’s findings. Courts may order an IME if the injury is a central issue and the defense shows good cause. The exam may include physical testing, medical history review, and sometimes psychological evaluation.

    • Used when injuries are disputed.

    • May be court-ordered.

    • Includes testing and history review.

    • Can involve physical or mental health exams.

    Why are IMEs important to defendants?

    They provide the defense with an alternative medical opinion that can be used to challenge the plaintiff’s case. If the IME report suggests the injury is less severe or unrelated to the accident, it can reduce settlement value. However, plaintiffs’ attorneys often prepare their clients to ensure they are truthful, consistent, and aware that the IME doctor is not their advocate.

    • Offers defense-friendly medical opinions.

    • Can limit damages or shift liability.

    • Influences jury perception.

    • Requires plaintiff preparation.

    How should plaintiffs handle an IME?

    They should arrive on time, be truthful about their injuries, and avoid exaggeration. Bringing a friend or legal representative for observation is sometimes allowed, depending on state rules. Plaintiffs should also review their medical history before the exam to ensure consistency with prior statements.

    • Be truthful and consistent.

    • Avoid exaggerating symptoms.

    • Know rights and state rules.

    • Consider observer or recording if permitted.

    Conclusion:
     An independent medical examination can significantly influence a personal injury case, so plaintiffs should approach it prepared, informed, and with guidance from their attorney.

    What is an independent medical examination?

    It’s a medical evaluation arranged by the opposing party to assess a plaintiff’s injuries.

    Not always — they are usually hired by the defense and may lean in their favor.

    If court-ordered, refusal can harm your case or lead to sanctions.

    Sometimes yes — rules vary by state.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Collateral Estoppel?

    What is Collateral Estoppel?

    What is collateral estoppel in personal injury law?

    Collateral estoppel, also known as “issue preclusion,” is a legal rule that prevents a party from re-litigating a specific issue that has already been decided in a prior case involving the same parties. Unlike res judicata, which blocks entire claims, collateral estoppel applies only to individual issues. In personal injury cases, it can prevent a party from re-arguing fault or damages if those issues were already decided in a different proceeding.

    • Prevents re-arguing decided issues.

    • Also called issue preclusion.

    • Applies when same parties are involved.

    • Narrower than res judicata.

    When does collateral estoppel apply?

    It applies when (1) the same issue was actually litigated in a prior case, (2) it was essential to the final judgment, and (3) the party against whom it’s being used had a full and fair opportunity to litigate it. If all conditions are met, the party can’t raise that issue again.

    • Issue was actually litigated.

    • Was essential to the judgment.

    • Same parties were involved.

    • Party had full and fair opportunity to argue.

    Why is collateral estoppel important?

    It promotes efficiency by preventing courts from reconsidering matters that have already been fairly decided. It also protects parties from having to fight the same battle twice, saving time, money, and emotional stress.

    • Saves judicial resources.

    • Protects parties from repeated litigation.

    • Ensures consistency in court rulings.

    • Encourages final resolution of disputes.

    How is it different from res judicata?

    Res judicata bars entire claims, while collateral estoppel bars only specific issues. For example, if fault was decided in one case, that decision can carry over to another related case under collateral estoppel, even if the second case involves a different legal claim.

    • Res judicata → bars whole claims.

    • Collateral estoppel → bars specific issues.

    • Can apply in related but separate cases.

    • Both aim to prevent duplicative litigation.

    Conclusion:
     Collateral estoppel keeps courts from re-deciding issues that have already been fairly and conclusively resolved, ensuring efficiency and consistency in the legal process.

    What is collateral estoppel?

     It’s a rule that prevents re-litigation of specific issues already decided in a previous case.

    Res judicata bars entire claims; collateral estoppel bars only individual issues.

    Only if the issue was actually litigated and essential to the judgment.

    Yes — decisions in one can sometimes affect the other.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Bystander Emotional Distress?

    What is Bystander Emotional Distress?

    What is bystander emotional distress in personal injury law?

    Bystander emotional distress refers to the severe emotional trauma suffered by someone who witnesses a close family member being seriously injured or killed due to another’s negligence. It recognizes that emotional injuries can be just as devastating as physical ones. These claims typically require that the bystander was physically near the scene, directly observed the incident, and had a close relationship with the victim. The law sets strict requirements to prevent fraudulent or overly broad claims.

    • Covers emotional trauma from witnessing harm to a loved one.

    • Requires close relationship with the victim.

    • Usually requires presence at the scene.

    • Recognizes emotional harm as real damage.

    When can someone claim bystander emotional distress?

    It’s usually available when the bystander personally perceives the injury event as it happens — not when they learn about it later. For example, a mother watching her child struck by a negligent driver may qualify. States vary on whether the bystander must also be in the “zone of danger” of physical harm.

    • Must personally witness the event.

    • Learning about it later is not enough.

    • Some states require zone of danger exposure.

    • Requirements vary by jurisdiction.

    Why is this claim important?

    It provides a path for compensation for serious emotional harm that results from witnessing tragedy. Without it, many bystanders would be left uncompensated for life-altering trauma simply because they were not physically injured themselves.

    • Recognizes deep psychological harm.

    • Offers legal recovery for non-physical injury.

    • Encourages accountability for negligence.

    • Addresses emotional realities of traumatic events.

    What damages can be recovered?

    Damages may include the cost of psychological counseling, lost wages due to emotional disability, and compensation for pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. In some states, damages may be capped.

    • Therapy and counseling costs.

    • Lost income from emotional incapacity.

    • Pain and suffering damages.

    • Possible damage caps by state law.

    Conclusion:
     Bystander emotional distress claims acknowledge that witnessing a loved one’s serious injury can cause lasting emotional harm, even without direct physical injury.

    What is bystander emotional distress?

    It’s a claim for severe emotional trauma suffered from witnessing a loved one’s injury or death.

    In most states, yes — typically an immediate family relationship is required.

    Usually no — you must witness the event as it happens.

    No — requirements and recognition vary widely.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Multidistrict Litigation?

    What is Multidistrict Litigation?

    What is multidistrict litigation in personal injury law?

    Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a special federal court procedure used to consolidate civil cases from different districts that involve similar facts or legal issues. The goal is to streamline pretrial proceedings, avoid duplicative discovery, and ensure consistent rulings across similar cases. In personal injury law, MDLs are often used for mass tort cases like defective drug claims, medical device failures, or large-scale accidents. While cases are coordinated, each plaintiff still has their own individual claim and trial rights.

    • Consolidates similar cases in federal court.

    • Used to streamline pretrial proceedings.

    • Common in mass tort and product liability cases.

    • Plaintiffs keep individual trial rights.

    When is MDL used?

    It’s used when many lawsuits filed across the country share similar facts, making separate litigation inefficient. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decides whether to centralize cases and assigns them to one federal judge for pretrial management. This avoids conflicting rulings and saves time for all parties involved.

    • Triggered by multiple similar lawsuits.

    • Approved by JPML.

    • Assigned to one federal judge.

    • Avoids conflicting court decisions.

    Why is MDL important in injury cases?

    It can significantly reduce litigation costs for plaintiffs by allowing shared expert witnesses and coordinated discovery. It also prevents defendants from having to fight the same issues in multiple courts, which speeds up resolution. However, cases in MDL can still take years to resolve and may involve complex negotiations.

    • Reduces plaintiff costs.

    • Coordinates expert testimony.

    • Speeds up pretrial resolution.

    • May still take years to complete.

    How does MDL differ from a class action?

    In a class action, all plaintiffs are part of one collective case with a single outcome, while in MDL, each case remains separate. MDL focuses on efficiency in pretrial matters, but plaintiffs still have the right to pursue individual trials if no settlement is reached.

    • Class action → one case, one verdict.

    • MDL → separate cases, shared pretrial.

    • MDL allows individual trials.

    • Used for factually similar cases.

    Conclusion:
     Multidistrict litigation helps manage large groups of related injury cases efficiently, while still preserving each plaintiff’s right to their own trial and potential recovery.

    What is multidistrict litigation?

    It’s a process that consolidates similar federal cases for pretrial purposes to improve efficiency.

    The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation makes the decision.

    No — in MDL, cases remain separate and plaintiffs keep their own trial rights.

    Defective drugs, dangerous products, mass accidents, and environmental disasters.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Venue Shopping?

    What is Venue Shopping?

    What is venue shopping in personal injury law?

    Venue shopping, also called forum shopping, is the practice of choosing a court location believed to be most favorable to a party’s case. Lawyers may seek out jurisdictions known for higher plaintiff verdicts, more favorable procedural rules, or sympathetic juries. While it can be a strategic tool, it’s controversial because critics see it as exploiting the system rather than seeking a fair trial location. Courts and legislatures have taken steps to limit venue shopping through jurisdictional rules.

    • Choosing favorable court locations.

    • Also called forum shopping.

    • Often linked to jury tendencies or local laws.

    • Controversial but sometimes legally permitted.

    When does venue shopping occur?

    It often happens when a case can be filed in more than one proper location — for example, where the defendant lives, where the injury occurred, or where a business operates. Attorneys may weigh factors like speed of trial, court backlogs, and prior verdict trends when deciding where to file.

    • When multiple venues are legally proper.

    • Considers jury history and verdict size.

    • Looks at court efficiency.

    • Uses legal flexibility to a client’s advantage.

    Why is venue shopping used in personal injury cases?

    A favorable venue can dramatically affect settlement negotiations and trial outcomes. Plaintiffs may secure larger settlements simply because defendants want to avoid trial in a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction. Defendants, in turn, often try to move cases to what they see as more neutral venues.

    • Can increase settlement leverage.

    • May influence trial outcomes.

    • Affects case strategy from the start.

    • Used by both plaintiffs and defendants.

    Are there limits to venue shopping?

    Yes. Courts can transfer cases if they believe the chosen venue is inappropriate or inconvenient for the parties and witnesses. Many states also have laws restricting the practice, especially in cases with minimal connection to the chosen location.

    • Courts can transfer cases.

    • Laws limit abuse of venue choice.

    • Must have a legitimate connection to venue.

    • Restrictions vary by jurisdiction.

    Conclusion:
     Venue shopping can be a powerful legal strategy in personal injury cases, but it’s closely watched by courts to prevent abuse and ensure fairness.

    What is venue shopping?

    It’s choosing a court location thought to be favorable to your case.

    Yes, if the chosen venue has a legitimate legal connection to the case.

    To improve odds of a favorable settlement or trial verdict.

    Yes — they can request a venue change if the choice seems improper.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Guardian ad Litem?

    What is Guardian ad Litem?

    What is a guardian ad litem in personal injury law?

    A guardian ad litem (GAL) is a person appointed by the court to represent the best interests of a child or legally incompetent adult during a lawsuit. In personal injury cases, a GAL may be appointed to make legal decisions, approve settlements, and ensure the protected person’s rights are fully safeguarded. The GAL acts independently from the parties in the case and must report to the court about what outcome best serves the individual they represent. This role helps ensure that vulnerable parties have an advocate focused solely on their welfare.

    • Court-appointed representative for vulnerable individuals.

    • Acts in best interests of child or incapacitated adult.

    • Common in personal injury settlements.

    • Independent from other parties.

    When is a guardian ad litem appointed?

    A GAL is typically appointed when a minor is involved in a lawsuit, or when an adult is deemed legally incompetent due to injury, illness, or disability. This can happen at the start of a case or when it becomes clear that the person cannot make informed decisions. The GAL steps in to participate in legal proceedings, communicate with attorneys, and help the court evaluate settlements.

    • For minors in lawsuits.

    • For legally incapacitated adults.

    • Appointed early in litigation or as needed.

    • Helps court assess settlement fairness.

    Why is a guardian ad litem important?

    Without a GAL, vulnerable parties might be pressured into unfair settlements or fail to understand complex legal issues affecting their rights. The GAL ensures that decisions made during litigation truly benefit the person they represent and comply with court requirements. They also provide a written report to the judge detailing their recommendations.

    • Protects against unfair settlements.

    • Ensures rights are upheld.

    • Provides objective, court-guided advocacy.

    • Strengthens judicial oversight.

    What authority does a guardian ad litem have?

    The GAL can investigate facts, review evidence, and consult with experts to determine what serves the person’s best interests. They may also negotiate on the person’s behalf, recommend or reject settlement offers, and testify in court about their findings. However, their authority is limited to the scope defined by the court’s appointment order.

    • Can investigate and gather facts.

    • May recommend or reject settlements.

    • Can testify in court about best interests.

    • Powers limited to court’s instructions.

    Conclusion:
     A guardian ad litem is a safeguard in the legal system that ensures minors and legally incompetent adults are represented fairly and their interests are fully protected in personal injury cases.

    What is a guardian ad litem?

    A court-appointed representative who protects the best interests of a minor or legally incompetent adult during a lawsuit.

    Not necessarily — some are lawyers, but others may be trained advocates appointed to act in the person’s best interests.

    Costs may be paid by the parties involved, covered by the court, or deducted from the settlement.

    Yes — but the court must ultimately approve it.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Premises Liability?

    What is Premises Liability?

    What is premises liability in personal injury law?

    Premises liability is the legal responsibility of property owners and occupiers to maintain safe conditions for visitors. If someone is injured because of a dangerous condition on the property, the owner may be held liable if they knew or should have known about the hazard.

    • Responsibility for safe property conditions.

    • Applies to owners and occupiers.

    • Covers slip and falls, unsafe structures, poor lighting, etc.

    • Requires knowledge or reasonable awareness of hazard.

    When does premises liability apply?

    It applies when a person is lawfully on the property and is injured due to unsafe conditions the owner failed to fix or warn about. In some cases, it may also apply to trespassers, especially children under the “attractive nuisance” doctrine.

    • Covers lawful visitors and sometimes trespassing children.

    • Requires failure to fix or warn of hazards.

    • Hazards include spills, broken steps, poor security, etc.

    • Standards vary by state law.

    Why is premises liability important for injury victims?

    It ensures that property owners are held accountable for unsafe environments and that victims can recover damages for their injuries. This encourages better maintenance and safety standards.

    • Promotes safe property upkeep.

    • Helps victims recover damages.

    • Encourages proactive safety measures.

    • Holds owners accountable.

    What are examples of premises liability cases?

    Common examples include slip-and-fall accidents in stores, injuries from falling objects, swimming pool accidents, and inadequate security leading to assaults.

    • Slip and falls on wet floors.

    • Falling merchandise in stores.

    • Swimming pool accidents.

    • Inadequate lighting or security.

    Conclusion:
     Premises liability protects visitors by holding property owners responsible for maintaining safe conditions. It’s a key part of personal injury law aimed at preventing avoidable accidents.

    What is premises liability?

    It’s the legal duty of property owners to maintain safe conditions for visitors.

    Yes — in many cases, tenants or occupiers share responsibility for safety.

    Sometimes — especially if a child is injured due to an attractive nuisance.

    Yes — actual or constructive knowledge is usually required.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Dram Shop Liability?

    What is Dram Shop Liability?

    What is dram shop liability in personal injury law?

    Dram shop liability is a legal doctrine that holds bars, restaurants, and other establishments that serve alcohol responsible if they sell or serve alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person (or sometimes a minor) who then causes injury or death. The name comes from old “dram shops” that sold spirits by the dram, a small unit of measure.

    • Holds alcohol sellers accountable for overserving.

    • Applies to intoxicated patrons who cause harm.

    • Often covers sales to minors.

    • Based on state dram shop laws.

    When does dram shop liability apply?

    It applies when a licensed establishment serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person or a minor, and that person causes injury — often in a drunk driving accident. Laws vary by state, with some imposing strict liability and others requiring proof of negligence.

    • Serving visibly intoxicated patrons.

    • Selling to underage customers.

    • Harm caused soon after alcohol service.

    • Rules vary by jurisdiction.

    Why is dram shop liability important?

    It creates accountability for businesses that profit from alcohol sales and helps reduce the dangers of overserving. For victims, it provides an additional source of compensation beyond the intoxicated person who caused the harm.

    • Encourages responsible alcohol service.

    • Offers additional compensation sources.

    • Deters overserving intoxicated people.

    • Protects public safety.

    Are there limits to dram shop liability?

    Yes. Many states limit liability to cases where the service was to a visibly intoxicated person or a minor. Some states cap damages or require proof that the alcohol service was a direct cause of the harm.

    • Service must be to intoxicated or underage patrons.

    • May require direct causation proof.

    • Some states cap damages.

    • Laws vary widely.

    Conclusion:
     Dram shop liability laws protect the public by holding alcohol-serving businesses accountable when overserving leads to preventable tragedies.

    What is dram shop liability?

     It’s the legal responsibility of alcohol-serving establishments for harm caused by overserving intoxicated patrons or serving minors.

    Most states have dram shop laws, but the rules vary widely.

    In some states, yes — especially if they serve alcohol to minors.

    Usually yes — often based on visible signs of impairment.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon
    Posted on

    What is Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?

    What is Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?

    What is intentional infliction of emotional distress in personal injury law?

    Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is a legal claim that arises when someone’s extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes another person severe emotional harm. It focuses on emotional and psychological injuries rather than physical harm.

    • Covers severe emotional injuries.

    • Requires extreme and outrageous conduct.

    • Defendant must act intentionally or recklessly.

    • Common in harassment or abuse cases.

    What must be proven for IIED?

    Generally, the plaintiff must prove:
     (1) the defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous,
     (2) the conduct was intentional or reckless,
     (3) the conduct caused severe emotional distress, and
     (4) the distress is supported by credible evidence.

    • Extreme and outrageous conduct.

    • Intentional or reckless behavior.

    • Causal link to emotional harm.

    • Evidence of severe distress.

    What are examples of IIED?

    Examples include severe workplace harassment, stalking, public humiliation, or threats of serious harm. The behavior must go beyond mere rudeness or insults — it must be shocking and intolerable in a civilized society.

    • Harassment causing trauma.

    • Threats of serious harm.

    • Stalking or intimidation.

    • Humiliation that’s extreme.

    Why is IIED important in personal injury cases?

    It allows victims to recover damages for emotional suffering even when there’s no physical injury. Proving IIED can also open the door to punitive damages in extreme cases.

    • Provides compensation for emotional harm.

    • Can lead to punitive damages.

    • Protects victims from severe mistreatment.

    • Recognizes mental health impacts of abuse.

    Conclusion:
     Intentional infliction of emotional distress holds people accountable for extreme conduct that causes serious emotional harm, even without physical injury.

    What is intentional infliction of emotional distress?

    It’s a claim for damages when someone’s extreme, outrageous conduct causes severe emotional harm.

    No — IIED focuses on emotional harm, though evidence of distress is needed.

    It must be so outrageous that it’s intolerable in a civilized society.

    Yes — in cases of extreme and malicious conduct.

    Additional Articles

    Explore All Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Coming Soon