The Trial Lawyer's Journal

TLJ Small Logo
Close
Group 39053677
Share Your Story with Trial Lawyer’s Journal
Trial Lawyer’s Journal is built on the voices of trial lawyers like you. Share your journey, insights, and experiences through articles, interviews, and our podcast, Celebrating Justice.
Stay Updated
Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest from TLJ.



    What is Comparative Fault?

    What is comparative fault in personal injury law?

    Comparative fault is a legal rule used to determine how much compensation an injured person can receive when they are partially responsible for their own injury. Instead of completely barring recovery, the law reduces the amount of damages based on the victim’s share of fault.

    • Reduces damages based on victim’s own fault.

    • Allows partial recovery even if partly to blame.

    • Applies in many personal injury cases.

    • Promotes fair allocation of responsibility.

    What are the types of comparative fault?

    There are two main types: pure comparative fault and modified comparative fault. Under pure comparative fault, you can recover damages even if you were 99% at fault, but your recovery is reduced accordingly. Under modified comparative fault, you can only recover if your fault is below a certain threshold (often 50% or 51%).

    • Pure → recover even if mostly at fault.

    • Modified → recover only if fault below threshold.

    • Threshold usually 50% or 51%.

    • Rules vary by state.

    Why does comparative fault matter in injury cases?

    It directly impacts the amount of money a victim can receive. Understanding the rule helps attorneys strategize negotiations and trial arguments to minimize their client’s assigned percentage of fault.

    • Directly affects compensation amount.

    • Guides case strategy.

    • Impacts settlement negotiations.

    • Varies significantly by jurisdiction.

    How is fault determined?

    Fault is decided based on the evidence presented — including witness testimony, accident reports, and expert analysis. The jury or judge assigns a percentage of responsibility to each party involved.

    • Based on evidence and testimony.

    • Jury or judge assigns percentages.

    • Considers actions of all parties.

    • Involves legal and factual analysis.

    Conclusion:
    Comparative fault ensures that responsibility for an injury is shared fairly between all parties, but it can greatly reduce the compensation a victim receives.

    What is comparative fault?

    It’s a rule that reduces compensation when the injured person shares blame for the accident.

    No — some use contributory negligence, which can bar recovery entirely.

    Pure allows recovery regardless of fault percentage; modified sets a threshold.

    Typically a jury or judge based on the evidence.

    Additional Articles

    Discover Next

    Insights from Experts

    Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.

    Author