The eggshell skull rule is a legal principle stating that a defendant must take their victim as they find them. If a victim has a pre-existing condition or vulnerability that makes an injury worse, the defendant is still fully responsible for all resulting harm — even if it’s far greater than what would happen to a healthier person.
Without it, defendants could escape full responsibility simply because their victim was unusually fragile. This rule ensures fairness by requiring wrongdoers to compensate for all harm actually caused, regardless of the victim’s physical condition.
If someone with brittle bone disease is in a car accident and suffers severe fractures from a crash that might only bruise a healthy person, the defendant is responsible for those severe injuries. The vulnerability of the victim is not a legal defense.
Yes. The defendant is only liable for harm actually caused by their actions — not for unrelated health problems. Plaintiffs must still prove the defendant’s conduct caused the injury.
Conclusion:
The eggshell skull rule ensures defendants fully compensate victims, even when pre-existing vulnerabilities make injuries worse than expected.
It’s the rule that a defendant is fully liable for a victim’s injuries even if they are more severe due to a pre-existing condition.
Yes — it can apply to psychological injuries if they’re worsened by the incident.
Only if they can prove it would have happened regardless of their actions.
Yes — it’s a long-standing principle in U.S. law.
Did Clearpoint Cross the Line Into Unauthorized Practice of Law in an Arizona Foreclosure Case? A January 2026 court order from the United States.
Could RICO Finally Hold Big Pharma Accountable for Hidden Drug Risks? In a groundbreaking development for pharmaceutical accountability, Wisner Baum LLP has pushed a.
Law Firm Pushes Back on AI Accusations After Court Flags Faulty Citations A prominent law firm has denied using artificial intelligence to generate flawed.