Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is a legal claim that arises when someone’s extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes another person severe emotional harm. It focuses on emotional and psychological injuries rather than physical harm.
Generally, the plaintiff must prove:
(1) the defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous,
(2) the conduct was intentional or reckless,
(3) the conduct caused severe emotional distress, and
(4) the distress is supported by credible evidence.
Examples include severe workplace harassment, stalking, public humiliation, or threats of serious harm. The behavior must go beyond mere rudeness or insults — it must be shocking and intolerable in a civilized society.
It allows victims to recover damages for emotional suffering even when there’s no physical injury. Proving IIED can also open the door to punitive damages in extreme cases.
Conclusion:
Intentional infliction of emotional distress holds people accountable for extreme conduct that causes serious emotional harm, even without physical injury.
It’s a claim for damages when someone’s extreme, outrageous conduct causes severe emotional harm.
No — IIED focuses on emotional harm, though evidence of distress is needed.
It must be so outrageous that it’s intolerable in a civilized society.
Yes — in cases of extreme and malicious conduct.
Did Clearpoint Cross the Line Into Unauthorized Practice of Law in an Arizona Foreclosure Case? A January 2026 court order from the United States.
Could RICO Finally Hold Big Pharma Accountable for Hidden Drug Risks? In a groundbreaking development for pharmaceutical accountability, Wisner Baum LLP has pushed a.
Law Firm Pushes Back on AI Accusations After Court Flags Faulty Citations A prominent law firm has denied using artificial intelligence to generate flawed.