Trial Lawyer’s Journal is built on the voices of trial lawyers like you. Share your journey, insights, and experiences through articles, interviews, and our podcast, Celebrating Justice.
Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest from TLJ.
In one of New York’s most talked-about personal injury verdicts of 2025, trial lawyer Nick Liakas and litigation consultant Jessica Brylo take us behind their $22.75M victory against the NYC MTA.
What started as a subway “slip and fall” unraveled into a John Grisham-style legal thriller — disputed intent, questionable witnesses, layers of deception, and the anatomy of a closing argument that delivered.
0:30 – Introduction
1:30 – Client Intake: The Call
6:20 – Framing the Case: Jessica and Trial Dynamics
8:10 – Discovery: Uncovering the Truth
18:42 – Picking a Jury in New York
25:00 – Disproving the MTA’s Witnesses and Suicide Theory
32:50 – The Witness Statement (and Why Is There Only One?)
41:17 – The Closing Argument: Meet Joe Black (The Man in the Black Suit)
49:29 – The Verdict: Reflections on Collaboration
Get to the stories and go “Behind the Verdict” and learn:
Speakers:
ON THE 50TH floor at 40 Wall Street in New York City, Nicholas Liakas stares out the window of his corner office as a slow-moving, gray layer of fog wraps around the downtown skyscrapers looming across a city block.
In this thoughtful Closing Argument, Adam Wolk reflects on the deeper motivations behind his legal work, exploring the emotional toll of advocacy and the enduring pursuit of justice for those who need it most.
JANIE WAS WORKING through the needlessly briny, settled half of her shitty martini, in gulps of two, when she spotted his blazer, jeans, and wingtips breaching the stainedglass gates of the asinine hipster drinking den on which he had insisted via text late night at 2:51 in the morning when she had made the tragic…
Discover Next
Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.