What Is a Motion to Compel Discovery?

A motion to compel discovery asks the court to order an opposing party to answer a discovery request it has ignored or resisted, such as an interrogatory, document request or deposition question. Governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a), the motion is available after a good-faith meet-and-confer fails, and the court may award expenses or impose sanctions.

This article explains what a motion to compel is, when it may be filed, the meet-and-confer prerequisite, and the sanctions and fee-shifting that follow. Because discovery disputes are a routine feature of litigation, a working command of Rule 37 is part of everyday practice.

What Is a Motion to Compel Discovery and When Is It Filed?

A motion to compel discovery is a request that the court order an opponent to comply with its discovery obligations after the parties cannot resolve the dispute themselves. It is the enforcement mechanism behind the discovery rules: the discovery devices create the duty to respond, and Rule 37(a) supplies the remedy when a party refuses. The motion typically follows an evasive or incomplete answer, an unfounded objection, a failure to produce documents or a deponent’s refusal to answer a proper question. Under Rule 37(a)(4), an evasive or incomplete disclosure, answer or response is treated as a failure to respond, so a party cannot avoid a motion to compel simply by answering badly.

The motion arises in several familiar settings:

• A party fails to answer an interrogatory or serves boilerplate objections without substance.
• A party fails to produce documents in response to a request for production, or produces them incompletely.
• A deponent refuses to answer a proper question, or a party fails to designate a witness for a corporate deposition.
• A response is evasive or incomplete, which Rule 37(a)(4) treats as no response at all.

Why Is a Meet-and-Confer Required Before Filing?

A motion to compel is improper unless the movant first attempts, in good faith, to resolve the dispute directly with the opposing party. Rule 37(a)(1) requires that the motion include a certification that the movant has conferred or attempted to confer with the party failing to respond, in an effort to obtain the discovery without court action. Many districts add their own local rules imposing detailed meet-and-confer requirements, sometimes demanding a telephonic or in-person conference rather than an exchange of letters. The purpose is to conserve judicial resources by forcing counsel to narrow or resolve disputes before burdening the court.

The meet-and-confer prerequisite works as follows:

1. The requesting party identifies the specific deficiencies in the opponent’s responses.
2. Counsel confer in good faith — often by telephone or in person, as many local rules require — to try to resolve or narrow the dispute.
3. If the conference fails to produce agreement, the movant files the motion with a certification describing the effort.
4. A motion filed without a genuine meet-and-confer effort is subject to denial for failure to satisfy Rule 37(a)(1).

What Sanctions and Fees Can Follow a Motion to Compel?

Rule 37 makes fee-shifting the default when a motion to compel is granted or denied, and it authorizes escalating sanctions for continued noncompliance. Under Rule 37(a)(5), if the motion is granted, the court must generally order the losing party to pay the movant’s reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, unless the opposition was substantially justified or other circumstances make an award unjust. If a party then disobeys an order compelling discovery, Rule 37(b) authorizes far stronger sanctions, up to and including striking pleadings, deeming facts established, or entering a default or dismissal. In the most serious cases, a related protective order in litigation may also shape what must be produced and on what terms.

The available consequences escalate in severity:

• Expense-shifting under Rule 37(a)(5): the party who loses the motion ordinarily pays the prevailing party’s reasonable fees and costs.
• Merits sanctions under Rule 37(b) for violating an order to compel, including deemed admissions, preclusion of evidence, or striking claims and defenses.
• Terminating sanctions in extreme cases, such as default judgment against a defendant or dismissal of a plaintiff‘s action.
• Contempt for disobeying a discovery order, available in appropriate circumstances.

How Does a Motion to Compel Fit Into Litigation Strategy?

A motion to compel is both a tool for obtaining needed evidence and a means of building a record of an opponent’s obstruction. Practitioners use it to pry loose documents and testimony a party is withholding, but the surrounding correspondence and the fee-shifting provisions also create pressure and a paper trail that can matter later. Because the same conduct that supports a motion to compel — stonewalling, evasive answers or destruction of evidence — can support broader relief, an early, well-documented motion often shapes the tenor of the entire case.

The strategic dimensions include:

• The motion secures evidence essential to proving claims and defenses, from a deposition answer to a withheld internal document.
• The meet-and-confer record and fee-shifting provisions create leverage and document an opponent’s pattern of resistance.
• A granted motion establishes a court order, so any further noncompliance exposes the opponent to the more severe sanctions of Rule 37(b).
• Timing matters, because courts expect discovery disputes to be raised promptly and within the schedule set by the case management order.

Used well, the motion to compel does more than resolve a single dispute — it sets expectations for how discovery will proceed. A party that establishes early that it will enforce its rights, and that a court will shift fees for unjustified resistance, often finds later disputes easier to resolve without motion practice.

Conclusion

A motion to compel discovery is the Rule 37(a) mechanism for enforcing discovery obligations when an opponent fails to answer or produce, and it is available only after a good-faith meet-and-confer effort. Fee-shifting is the default consequence when the motion is granted, and disobedience of a resulting order exposes a party to escalating sanctions under Rule 37(b), up to dismissal or default. Because local rules add their own meet-and-confer and timing requirements, practitioners should confirm the governing standards before filing.

Frequently Asked Questions